Место #32 из 46 · проверено 2026-09-01
Triple-A: обзор
Triple-A получает 5.8 из 10 в этом индексе и занимает место #32 из 46. Опубликованная ставка процессинга — от 1%. Число активов не опубликовано. Верификация: kyb и kyc. Провайдер публикует 68% отслеживаемых здесь полей.
Singapore-licensed, aimed at Asia-Pacific and MENA, settling local currency to merchants.
- Балл
- 5.8/10
- Процессинг от
- 1%
- Активов в списке
- —
- Верификация мерчанта
- KYB и KYC
- Кастоди
- Кастодиальный
- Раскрывает
- 68%
Эта страница ещё не переведена. Ниже — английский оригинал; цифры в обеих версиях одни и те же.
Triple-A в двух словах
Сайт провайдера| Процессинг от | 1% |
|---|---|
| Конвертация | |
| Вывод средств | |
| Активов в списке | |
| Сети | Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tron |
| Верификация мерчанта | KYB и KYC |
| Кастоди | Кастодиальный: провайдер держит средства до расчёта |
| Юрисдикция | Singapore |
| Работает с | 2018 |
| Интеграции | WooCommerce, API |
Прочерк означает, что провайдер не публикует цифру, а не то, что мы не искали. Комиссии взяты со страницы тарифов самого провайдера.
Что умеет Triple-A?
Вертикали, которые провайдер называет публично: ecommerce, saas, cross-border.
Как оценён Triple-A?
Веса| Критерий | Вес | Балл |
|---|---|---|
| Assets, networks and geography How many assets and chains are live for merchants, and in which markets settlement actually works. | 25 | 6 |
| All-in cost Processing percentage, conversion spread and payout cost taken together, not the headline number alone. | 25 | 6 |
| Onboarding and verification What a merchant must submit before going live, how long it takes, and which verticals are refused outright. | 20 | 5 |
| Integrations and API Maintained plugins, API surface, webhook reliability and whether a developer can reach a test transaction from public docs alone. | 18 | 6 |
| Support and operations Reachable channels, published response commitments, and documented handling of underpayment and wrong-network sends. | 12 | 6 |
| Взвешенный итог | 5.8 |
Triple-A по пяти критериям
Оценка 0–10 · взвешенный итог 5.8
Сильные стороны
- Licensed in Singapore, which is a clearer regulatory footing than most providers in this index publish at all.
- Merchants receive local currency while customers pay in crypto, so volatility never reaches the merchant balance sheet.
- Covers Asia-Pacific and MENA specifically, where several of the European and US providers here do not settle locally.
Слабые стороны
- The 1% figure comes from secondary reporting rather than a published tariff page, and reported rates elsewhere range from 0.7% to 1.5%.
- Neither conversion nor payout cost is published, so the headline is a starting point rather than a total.
На этой странице
A named regulator, which is rare here#
A Singapore licence is a clearer regulatory footing than most providers in this index publish at all. For a business whose finance function asks who regulates a payments vendor, that is a complete answer where most cards offer none.
It does not tell you the provider is cheap or well run, and this index does not score it as though it did. It tells you there is a regime and somewhere to complain, which is more than the majority of this category offers.
The rate is reported, not published#
The 1% figure comes from secondary reporting rather than a tariff page, and reported rates elsewhere span 0.7% to 1.5%. This card prints the provenance rather than promoting the number to a fact, because the difference between a provider page and a report is exactly what a reader is here to learn.
That spread is wide enough to change any comparison built on it. Get your own rate in writing before treating this card as priced.
Local currency settlement is the product#
Customers pay in crypto and merchants receive local currency across Asia-Pacific and MENA, regions where several European and American providers indexed here do not settle locally at all. Volatility never reaches the merchant balance sheet.
For a business in Singapore, the Gulf or Southeast Asia, that is often not a preference but the difference between a provider that works and one that does not. Establish your banking country before reading anything else on this card.
What is not published#
Conversion cost, payout cost and an asset count. Three named networks — Bitcoin, Ethereum and Tron — is a floor rather than a list, and white label, recurring billing and point of sale are absent too.
So the headline is a starting point rather than a total, and the feature surface has to be established by asking. At 68% disclosure this sits mid-field, which is typical for the category and unhelpful for a merchant modelling monthly cost.
Verification is on the heavier side#
Business verification plus identity checks on individuals. That is the fuller requirement, and it follows from holding a licence: a regulated entity has diligence obligations that an unregulated one can decline to describe.
Plan the onboarding timeline accordingly rather than treating it as paperwork. The KYB guide covers what each side asks for and why the two are often confused.
Integration and platform coverage#
WooCommerce and an API. That is narrower than the plugin-heavy providers here, which name five or seven platforms, and adequate for a business integrating directly or running a WordPress store.
Mass payouts, fiat settlement and invoicing are all documented, which is a fuller operational surface than the published pricing suggests. If any of the three matters to you, this card answers it where several cheaper ones do not.
Who should shortlist this#
A merchant banking in Asia-Pacific or MENA who wants local currency arriving and a regulator named. Where that describes you, the alternatives are considerably thinner than the size of this index implies.
A business that needs a defensible cost figure in front of a procurement review should get the three unpublished numbers first, or compare against CoinGate, which publishes all of them and settles euro instead.
Who should not#
A merchant banking in the euro area, where the settlement advantage that makes this card distinctive does not apply and better-documented options exist.
A business whose customers hold unusual assets. No count is published and three networks is a short list, so coverage has to be confirmed by asking, and the answer may be narrower than the alternatives.
How this card scores where it does#
Nothing scores badly and nothing scores outstandingly, which reflects a provider that publishes a licence and withholds most numbers. Cost is held down by three unpublished components rather than by an expensive rate.
The licence itself is not a scored criterion, and for some readers it should outweigh several that are. The methodology page sets out what the five criteria measure and lets you reweight them; it cannot weight something it does not score.
Как читать эту карточку?
Балл 5.8 складывается из пяти взвешенных критериев выше, применённых одинаково к каждому провайдеру в каталоге. Если вы взвешиваете критерии иначе, страница методики пересчитает весь индекс под ваши веса, и полученный порядок будет не менее правомерным, чем этот.
Открытость 68% — отдельное измерение, и часто более полезное. Оно считает только поля, которые Triple-A публикует сам, и потому предсказывает, какая часть вашей проверки пройдёт в переписке, а не по документации. Если вы уже пользуетесь Triple-A и хотите уйти, страница смены провайдера разбирает ближайшие замены.
О чём Triple-A не сообщает
Проверено по страницам самого провайдера 2026-09-01. Triple-A не публикует стоимость конвертации, стоимость вывода, число поддерживаемых активов, наличие white label, поддержку рекуррентных платежей, наличие POS-решения.
Запросите каждое из этого письменно до подписания. Провайдер, который отвечает на фактический вопрос позиционированием, сообщил вам кое-что полезное о следующих двух годах.
Triple-A в сравнениях
Все сравненияГде ещё встречается Triple-A
Вопросы о Triple-A
Triple-A — надёжный провайдер?
Triple-A работает с 2018 года и базируется в юрисдикции «Singapore». Провайдер публикует 68% полей, которые отслеживает индекс. Ничто здесь не является оценкой безопасности: проверьте кастоди и расчёты сами, прежде чем направлять объём через любого процессора.
Сколько берёт Triple-A?
Опубликованная ставка процессинга — от 1%, проверено 2026-09-01. Стоимость конвертации не публикуется, поэтому это минимум, а не полная стоимость.
Требует ли Triple-A KYC?
Triple-A требует от мерчантов: kyb и kyc, согласно опубликованной документации.
Какие лучшие альтернативы Triple-A?
Три ближайшие замены — CoinGate, B2BINPAY, Speend. Какая подходит, зависит от того, уходите вы из-за стоимости, охвата или онбординга.