Zaprite: обзор

The cap is the whole pricing argument#

Transaction fees stop at fifteen dollars regardless of payment size. On a five thousand dollar invoice that is 0.3%; at fifty thousand it is 0.03%, which is an order of magnitude below anything else in this index and not a rounding difference.

That single line reveals the intended customer. This is priced for consultants, agencies and firms sending large invoices, not for a shop taking twenty dollar orders — and against that audience it is the cheapest card here by a wide margin.

A subscription, which is unusual in this category#

Twenty-five dollars a month or two hundred and forty a year, with a thirty-day trial. Every other provider in this index charges only when money moves, so a fixed monthly cost is a genuine difference rather than a presentational one.

The included credit softens it considerably: twenty-five dollars of transaction fees a month, three hundred a year on the annual plan. A merchant billing under that ceiling pays the subscription and nothing more, which is a clean and predictable arrangement.

Which products carry a fee and which do not#

Payment requests, invoices, recurring invoices, payment links and the point of sale carry no transaction fee. The API and the WooCommerce plugin carry one percent, and event tickets carry one percent plus three dollars each.

That split is worth reading carefully because it inverts the usual arrangement. The manual, low-volume products are free and the automated, high-volume ones are charged, which is a coherent way to price but not the way anybody else here does it.

Bitcoin, Lightning, Liquid and Tether#

Three Bitcoin layers plus one stablecoin, with dollar payments accepted alongside. Liquid support is genuinely rare and points at a Bitcoin-native audience rather than a general merchant one.

Two assets is the second-narrowest list in this index. For a Bitcoin-denominated consultancy that is exactly right; for a consumer checkout it removes the card from consideration before any other criterion matters.

Built for invoicing rather than checkout#

Recurring invoices, payment requests and payment links are first-class products, and the ecommerce side is a single WooCommerce plugin. The product is an accounts-receivable tool that happens to settle in bitcoin.

Read against that description the narrow asset list, the flat subscription and the fee cap all line up. It is one of the few cards in the index whose pricing model actually describes its intended user.

The single WooCommerce plugin is the only storefront path, and it carries a transaction fee where the manual products do not. That pricing choice says plainly which half of the product the provider expects you to use.

What the card cannot answer#

The custody model is not stated on the pages we read, and for a product handling invoices that is the question a reader should want answered first. Whether funds route to a wallet the merchant controls or sit in an account is left open.

Verification requirements and the operating entity are similarly absent. The custody guide sets out why that first question is worth an email before any subscription starts.

The operating entity is unnamed as well, which for a tool that sits between a firm and its clients is worth establishing before the first large invoice rather than after it.

Who should shortlist this#

A consultancy, agency or professional firm invoicing in bitcoin with average invoice values in the thousands. The cap makes this the cheapest option in the index at that size, and the recurring invoicing is better than anything else here.

A merchant billing under twenty-five dollars a month in fees also does well, since the included credit covers it. Between those two cases sits a band where the subscription is dead weight and a per-transaction provider is cheaper.

Where Zaprite sits in the index#

Coverage scores poorly and cost scores moderately, and both numbers understate the card for the specific buyer it is built for. A scale designed for general processors cannot help but penalise a deliberately narrow tool.

Everything above came from the provider's own pages on 2026-09-02. Running the numbers against your own average invoice value settles this card faster than any weighting on the methodology page will.