70 comparisons
Head to head
Direct comparisons between two providers, each built from what both publish rather than from a general ranking. Pairs are chosen by hand. 46 providers would give 1035 combinations and only the pairs worth writing are written, so the rest are not generated.
Published comparisons
Full catalogue
NOWPayments vs CoinGate NOWPayments wins on breadth with 350+ assets against CoinGate's 10+. CoinGate wins on cost transparency, publishing conversion, SEPA, SWIFT …
NOWPayments vs Cryptomus Both are broad-coverage processors at a similar headline rate. NOWPayments charges a flat 1% from the first transaction; Cryptomus advertise…
NOWPayments vs BitPay BitPay costs 2% + $0.25 below $500k monthly volume against a flat 1%, and requires full KYB and director KYC. It buys daily fiat settlement …
BitPay vs Coinbase Commerce Two US processors with the clearest counterparty risk in the category. Coinbase Commerce charges a flat 1% against BitPay's 2% + $0.25 entry…
Coinbase Commerce vs CoinGate Same 1% headline, different shape. Coinbase Commerce settles into USDC on Base, Ethereum, Polygon and Solana. CoinGate settles to SEPA at no…
CoinGate vs Plisio Plisio's 0.5% is half CoinGate's rate and its white-label tier is priced openly at 1.5%. CoinGate publishes conversion and payout costs wher…
CoinsPaid vs Cryptomus CoinsPaid is built for iGaming volume and ships a SoftSwiss connector; Cryptomus is a general processor with wider plugin coverage. Neither …
OpenNode vs BitPay OpenNode is Bitcoin and Lightning only with free conversion; BitPay takes fifteen assets at 2% + $0.25. For a Bitcoin-only merchant OpenNode…
CoinPayments vs NOWPayments CoinPayments splits pricing between coins at 0.5% and tokens at 1%, so a stablecoin-heavy merchant pays the same as NOWPayments' flat rate. …
NOWPayments vs CoinsPaid NOWPayments is the generalist with published pricing and the widest asset list. CoinsPaid is the iGaming specialist with fiat settlement and…
Plisio vs Cryptomus Two providers competing on the lowest published rate, and they mean different things by it. Plisio's 0.5% applies from the first transaction…
BitPay vs CoinGate A US processor against a European one, and the gap is wider than the 2% versus 1% headline suggests. CoinGate publishes every fee line and s…
OpenNode vs Coinbase Commerce Two narrow products aimed at opposite ends of crypto. OpenNode does Bitcoin and Lightning with free conversion. Coinbase Commerce settles ev…
CoinGate vs CoinPayments CoinPayments is cheaper on coins and matches CoinGate on tokens, which covers most real volume. CoinGate answers back with the most complete…
NOWPayments vs Plisio The widest asset list against the lowest published rate, which is close to the cleanest trade in this index. NOWPayments lists 350 or more a…
CoinsPaid vs CoinPayments Both quote from around 0.5% and neither publishes a fee table you can rely on. CoinsPaid brings iGaming specialisation and fiat settlement. …
Speend vs NOWPayments Both publish a flat entry rate and both cover a wide asset list. Speend charges half as much for same-currency settlement and states that th…
Speend vs Cryptomus Speend publishes 0.5% that applies from the first transaction. Cryptomus advertises 0.4% and starts new merchants at 2%. For anyone below ne…
Speend vs CoinsPaid Both serve iGaming and high-risk verticals. Speend publishes a rate, an asset count and its verification model. CoinsPaid publishes no prici…
CoinRemitter vs Apirone Two providers that charge nothing to accept payments and move the fee to withdrawal. CoinRemitter takes 0.23% on the way out and requires no…
B2BINPAY vs BVNK The two enterprise cards in this index, separated by what they are willing to write down. B2BINPAY publishes a tiered table covering crypto …
Speend vs 0xProcessing Both take the verticals most processors decline, and they price that willingness differently. Speend posts 0.5% and removes the identity che…
Triple-A vs CoinGate The same 1% headline pointed at opposite halves of the world. CoinGate is Lithuanian, publishes every cost component and settles euro for fr…
CoinRemitter vs NOWPayments The lowest published cost in the index against the widest published asset list. CoinRemitter charges nothing to accept and 0.23% on withdraw…
BTCPay Server vs NOWPayments Two ways to be paid without anyone holding your money. BTCPay Server is software you run, charging nothing and supporting Bitcoin and Lightn…
BTCPay Server vs Coinsnap Bitcoin and Lightning acceptance, run two different ways. BTCPay Server is free software you host yourself with no fiat leg at all. Coinsnap…
PassimPay vs Cryptomus Two broad processors with deep plugin shelves and low published entry rates. Cryptomus starts at 0.4% across a hundred and twenty assets. Pa…
Radom vs CoinGate The lowest published percentage in this index against the most completely published fee table in it. Radom charges 0.5% plus fifty cents on …
OxaPay vs Plisio Both publish a rate and both sell white label. Plisio charges 0.5%, never holds your funds and maintains plugins for five platforms. OxaPay …
PayCek vs CoinGate Two European processors settling into euros, priced in opposite directions. PayCek charges the merchant nothing and does not publish the spr…
Bitnovo Pay vs PayCek Two southern European gateways aimed at shops with counters, both settling into euros. Bitnovo Pay publishes a rate from 0.95% and five ecom…
DePay vs BTCPay Server Two non-custodial products offering the same free tier on different rails. BTCPay Server is Bitcoin and Lightning, self-hosted, with twenty-…
Zaprite vs OpenNode Bitcoin acceptance for two different businesses. OpenNode is a Bitcoin and Lightning gateway with fiat settlement and a published payout str…
Aurpay vs CoinRemitter Two low-cost cards that charge at opposite ends of the transaction. Aurpay takes a flat 0.8% on acceptance and names the network for every a…
SpectroCoin vs Bitpace Two broad-coverage processors that publish no merchant rate at all. SpectroCoin lists 50 cryptocurrencies, settles into four fiat currencies…
xMoney vs BVNK Two providers selling to businesses that will run a compliance review before a price comparison. xMoney is a licensed Romanian e-money insti…
Sheepy vs CoinsPaid Acceptance and bulk payouts from one account, offered by a young platform and an established one. Sheepy publishes twenty assets, four plugi…
GoUrl vs Apirone Two non-custodial forwarders built for an earlier version of this market. GoUrl charges 1.5% on acceptance, names fourteen coins exactly and…
Cryptomus vs CoinGate A low rate across a wide catalogue against a modest rate you can add up. Cryptomus publishes 0.4% over a hundred and twenty assets with seve…
Coinbase Commerce vs Cryptomus A regulated American name against a broad Canadian catalogue. Coinbase Commerce charges 1% across ten assets on Base, Ethereum, Polygon, Sol…
Plisio vs CoinPayments The same published 0.5% from two very different companies. Plisio settles to a wallet you control, names six integrations and supports Moner…
BitPay vs Cryptomus The oldest card in this index against one of the newest. BitPay charges 2%, has traded since 2011, publishes fiat settlement and point of sa…
NOWPayments vs OpenNode The widest catalogue in this index against the narrowest. NOWPayments publishes more than three hundred and fifty assets at a flat 1% and ne…
CoinsPaid vs CoinGate Two Estonian and Lithuanian processors from the same year, aimed at different customers. CoinsPaid charges 0.5%, integrates with SoftSwiss a…
B2BINPAY vs Speend The two lowest published rates in this index that come with business verification attached. B2BINPAY charges 0.25% and publishes its SEPA an…
Triple-A vs BVNK Two regulated-looking providers requiring business and personal verification, aimed at businesses rather than shops. Triple-A publishes 1% f…
0xProcessing vs Bitpace Two white-label providers that publish no processing rate. 0xProcessing serves high-risk and forex, charges nothing on withdrawal beyond net…
Apirone vs BTCPay Server Two non-custodial ways to accept Bitcoin without paying to accept it. Apirone charges nothing on acceptance and a fixed fee on withdrawal, w…
PassimPay vs Speend Both publish 0.5% and both publish more than the headline. PassimPay adds a 0.2% conversion figure, a stated 3.5% ceiling and eleven plugins…
OxaPay vs NOWPayments Signing up without documents at 1.5% against a flat 1% with the widest catalogue here. OxaPay prices six products separately, holds the bala…
Radom vs NOWPayments Subscriptions and payouts from two providers with opposite fee shapes. Radom charges 0.5% plus a flat fifty cents, settles fiat, and is inco…
Bitnovo Pay vs Coinsnap Two European gateways built for small shops that want euros in the bank. Bitnovo Pay publishes a rate from 0.95%, five plugins and three reg…
SpectroCoin vs CoinsPaid Two Estonian-registered processors with broad coverage and fiat settlement, one of which publishes a rate. CoinsPaid charges 0.5%, has trade…
xMoney vs Triple-A Two licensed operators selling to businesses that check the regulator before the rate. xMoney names a Romanian e-money institution and VASPs…
Sheepy vs Cryptomus Two young mid-market processors, three years apart, aimed at platforms that pay money out as well as take it in. Cryptomus was founded in 20…
GoUrl vs Plisio Two non-custodial processors a decade apart in design. GoUrl forwards fourteen proof-of-work coins to your own addresses at 1.5% with no ver…
Zaprite vs Coinsnap Bitcoin acceptance for a firm that invoices against Bitcoin acceptance for a shop that sells. Zaprite charges $25 a month plus 1% with fees …
DePay vs Plisio Two non-custodial processors on different rails. DePay routes wallet payments across ten smart-contract chains at 1.5%, or nothing if you ho…
Aurpay vs Cryptomus Two low-rate cards aimed at small online stores. Aurpay publishes 0.8% across eight rails, names the network for every stablecoin, and suppo…
PayCek vs SpectroCoin Two European processors settling into bank currency, neither of which lets you calculate what acceptance costs. PayCek states the merchant f…
Crypto.com Pay vs Coinbase Commerce Two exchange-backed gateways with opposite cost shapes. Crypto.com Pay publishes zero on the transaction and 0.5% on settlement, and pays ou…
Binance Pay vs Crypto.com Pay The same idea with different exits. Both let a customer pay from an exchange balance with no gas and no waiting. Binance Pay charges nothing…
Paymento vs NOWPayments Two non-custodial gateways that never hold your funds. NOWPayments publishes 1% and 350+ assets and says nothing about verification. Payment…
ForumPay vs CoinGate Two European fiat-settling processors with opposite pricing styles. CoinGate itemises processing, conversion, SEPA, SWIFT and payout costs o…
Bitcart vs BTCPay Server Two free, self-hosted, non-custodial processors. BTCPay Server is Bitcoin and Lightning with a very long plugin list and the larger communit…
MyCryptoCheckout vs GoUrl Two WordPress-native, non-custodial options that forward payments to your own wallet. MyCryptoCheckout charges a flat licence and no per-tra…
CryptoCloud vs Cryptomus Two custodial gateways serving overlapping emerging-market merchants, both advertising a 0.4% floor that new merchants do not start on. Cryp…
Speed vs OpenNode Two Lightning-native gateways with different second halves. OpenNode is Bitcoin only, publishes free conversion and settles fiat in eight cu…
Coinify vs BitPay Two of the longest-running processors in the category, both built around fiat settlement. BitPay publishes a tiered rate from 2% falling to …
Paymento vs Plisio Two non-custodial gateways at a published 0.5%. Plisio names twelve assets including Monero and Zcash, a white-label tier priced openly and …
Why are there not more comparisons here?
A comparison page publishes only when both providers have at least 80% of their card fields resolved. Two providers who each publish a headline rate and nothing else produce a page that compares two dashes, which helps nobody and damages the site that publishes it. Pairs blocked by that rule are logged during the build rather than published thin.
If the pair you want is missing, the catalogue holds both cards with the same fields side by side, and the switching pages cover the case where you are leaving one provider rather than choosing between two.