Место #4 из 46 · проверено 2026-08-31
CoinPayments: обзор
CoinPayments получает 7.4 из 10 в этом индексе и занимает место #4 из 46. Опубликованная ставка процессинга — от 0.5%. Число активов не опубликовано. Верификация: не раскрыто. Провайдер публикует 58% отслеживаемых здесь полей.
Long-running processor split-priced between coins and tokens, with batch withdrawals.
- Балл
- 7.4/10
- Процессинг от
- 0.5%
- Активов в списке
- —
- Верификация мерчанта
- Не раскрыто
- Кастоди
- Кастодиальный
- Раскрывает
- 58%
Эта страница ещё не переведена. Ниже — английский оригинал; цифры в обеих версиях одни и те же.
CoinPayments в двух словах
Сайт провайдера| Процессинг от | 0.5% |
|---|---|
| Конвертация | |
| Вывод средств | |
| Активов в списке | |
| Сети | Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, Tron, BNB Chain |
| Верификация мерчанта | Не раскрыто |
| Кастоди | Кастодиальный: провайдер держит средства до расчёта |
| Юрисдикция | Not stated on the provider's public pages |
| Работает с | 2013 |
| Интеграции |
Прочерк означает, что провайдер не публикует цифру, а не то, что мы не искали. Комиссии взяты со страницы тарифов самого провайдера.
Что умеет CoinPayments?
Вертикали, которые провайдер называет публично: ecommerce, saas, igaming.
Как оценён CoinPayments?
Веса| Критерий | Вес | Балл |
|---|---|---|
| Assets, networks and geography How many assets and chains are live for merchants, and in which markets settlement actually works. | 25 | 8 |
| All-in cost Processing percentage, conversion spread and payout cost taken together, not the headline number alone. | 25 | 8 |
| Onboarding and verification What a merchant must submit before going live, how long it takes, and which verticals are refused outright. | 20 | 6 |
| Integrations and API Maintained plugins, API surface, webhook reliability and whether a developer can reach a test transaction from public docs alone. | 18 | 8 |
| Support and operations Reachable channels, published response commitments, and documented handling of underpayment and wrong-network sends. | 12 | 6 |
| Взвешенный итог | 7.4 |
CoinPayments по пяти критериям
Оценка 0–10 · взвешенный итог 7.4
Сильные стороны
- Batch withdrawals are reported to cut network costs substantially for merchants paying out often.
- Operating since 2013, with plugin coverage across six named platforms.
- No minimum volume, no contract and no setup fee, per the provider's own marketing pages.
Слабые стороны
- Coins and tokens are priced differently, so a stablecoin-heavy merchant pays roughly double the headline rate.
- The pricing page did not resolve at the time of checking, so figures here rest on secondary sources.
На этой странице
Split pricing, and who it actually helps#
Coins price at 0.5% and tokens at 1%. Since stablecoins are tokens and stablecoins carry most merchant volume, the effective rate for a typical merchant is 1%, which matches the flat-rate competitors rather than beating them.
The lower figure is real for a business taking payment predominantly in Bitcoin or Litecoin, and that describes a minority of the merchants who will read the headline. Check your own asset mix before assuming which number applies to you, because the answer flips the comparison.
Batch withdrawals, and why they do not show up in rate comparisons#
Grouping outbound transactions shares the per-transaction network overhead across recipients instead of paying it repeatedly. For a business paying out to many people regularly that is a substantial saving, and it appears in no processing-rate comparison anywhere.
Whether it matters to you is a question about direction rather than volume. A merchant only taking money in gains nothing from it. One paying four hundred affiliates every month gains more from it than from any plausible difference in processing rate. Mass payouts covers what else to test in that case.
Twelve years, and a pricing page that did not resolve#
Operating since 2013 with plugin coverage across six named platforms is a real track record, and it sits oddly next to a pricing page that failed to serve when this card was compiled. The figures here therefore rest on secondary sources, and the card records that rather than presenting them as confirmed.
That combination puts disclosure at 58%, below the index average. It is worth checking the page yourself before shortlisting, since a temporary failure and a permanent absence are different findings and only one of them is a mark against the provider.
What to establish#
Which of your assets price at which tier, since that decides your real rate. The conversion spread, which is unpublished as it is nearly everywhere here. And whether batch withdrawal has a minimum or a cap that would affect how you actually use it.
The fees guide covers assembling those into a comparable total.
How this card scores where it does#
Coverage and cost score well, and integrations score on six named platforms. The figures behind cost come from secondary reporting because the pricing page did not resolve, which the cons record explicitly.
Disclosure sits at 58%, below the index average. That gap between a good score and a modest disclosure figure is exactly the pattern the method separates the two numbers to expose.
Who should not choose this#
A stablecoin-heavy merchant attracted by the 0.5% headline, since tokens price at 1% and the advantage evaporates at the exact point most merchants sit.
A business that needs to confirm terms at source before committing. Until the pricing page resolves, everything here needs a written quote to be actionable.
Working out your own effective rate#
Take your last month of payments and split them by asset type. The share arriving as coins prices at 0.5% and the share arriving as tokens at 1%, and the blend is your real rate rather than either published figure.
Most merchants find the blend sits close to 1%, because stablecoins dominate. If yours does not, this card is genuinely cheaper than the flat-rate alternatives and the advantage is worth having.
Do the split before comparing rates, because the published headline describes a merchant who may not be you.
If the blend does come out near 1%, the deciding factor moves to batch withdrawals and the twelve-year track record, neither of which appears in a rate comparison at all.
Where CoinPayments sits in the index#
The short version of this card: batch withdrawals and a long track record, priced by asset type. Every figure above was read off the provider's own pages on 2026-08-31, and the fields it declines to publish are recorded as such rather than left blank.
The line worth checking yourself is cost, since the split between coins and tokens means your effective rate depends on your own asset mix rather than on any published figure. Work out which tier your volume actually falls into before comparing.
Как читать эту карточку?
Балл 7.4 складывается из пяти взвешенных критериев выше, применённых одинаково к каждому провайдеру в каталоге. Если вы взвешиваете критерии иначе, страница методики пересчитает весь индекс под ваши веса, и полученный порядок будет не менее правомерным, чем этот.
Открытость 58% — отдельное измерение, и часто более полезное. Оно считает только поля, которые CoinPayments публикует сам, и потому предсказывает, какая часть вашей проверки пройдёт в переписке, а не по документации. Если вы уже пользуетесь CoinPayments и хотите уйти, страница смены провайдера разбирает ближайшие замены.
О чём CoinPayments не сообщает
Проверено по страницам самого провайдера 2026-08-31. CoinPayments не публикует стоимость конвертации, стоимость вывода, число поддерживаемых активов, поддерживаемые платформы электронной коммерции, возможность расчёта в фиате, наличие white label, наличие POS-решения.
Запросите каждое из этого письменно до подписания. Провайдер, который отвечает на фактический вопрос позиционированием, сообщил вам кое-что полезное о следующих двух годах.
CoinPayments в сравнениях
Все сравненияГде ещё встречается CoinPayments
Вопросы о CoinPayments
CoinPayments — надёжный провайдер?
CoinPayments работает с 2013 года и не указывает юрисдикцию на публичных страницах. Провайдер публикует 58% полей, которые отслеживает индекс. Ничто здесь не является оценкой безопасности: проверьте кастоди и расчёты сами, прежде чем направлять объём через любого процессора.
Сколько берёт CoinPayments?
Опубликованная ставка процессинга — от 0.5%, проверено 2026-08-31. Стоимость конвертации не публикуется, поэтому это минимум, а не полная стоимость.
Требует ли CoinPayments KYC?
CoinPayments не публикует требования к верификации мерчанта. Это риск для планирования, а не ответ, и именно поэтому карточка получает такой балл за онбординг.
Какие лучшие альтернативы CoinPayments?
Три ближайшие замены — NOWPayments, Cryptomus, CoinGate. Какая подходит, зависит от того, уходите вы из-за стоимости, охвата или онбординга.