Crypto Gateway Index

21 провайдеров · проверено в сентябрь 2026 г.

Лучшие криптошлюзы для малого бизнеса

Speend возглавляет список с 8.3 из 10. Следом NOWPayments с 8.0, затем BTCPay Server с 7.7. Провайдеры, чья опубликованная ставка действует с первой транзакции, а не с объёма, ранжированные для мерчантов с оборотом до пятидесяти тысяч в месяц.

Эта страница ещё не переведена. Ниже — английский оригинал; цифры в обеих версиях одни и те же.

Как построен этот список

Провайдеры с опубликованной ставкой, действующей с первой транзакции, а не с минимальной ставкой, достижимой только при объёме.

Шорт-лист

Веса
Шлюз Балл От Активы Верификация Фиат Раскрывает
Speend 8.3 0.5% 300 Только KYB 63%
NOWPayments 8.0 1% 350 Не раскрыто 68%
BTCPay Server 7.7 0% Не требуется Нет 74%
CoinPayments 7.4 0.5% Не раскрыто 58%
Crypto.com Pay 7.1 0% 20 Только KYB Да 84%
CoinRemitter 7.0 0% 13 Не требуется 63%
Paymento 6.9 0.5% Не требуется Нет 63%
Plisio 6.9 0.5% 12 Не раскрыто 68%
CoinGate 6.7 1% 10 Не раскрыто Да 89%
MyCryptoCheckout 6.7 0% 100 Не требуется Нет 89%
OxaPay 6.6 1.5% 20 Не требуется 79%
CryptoCloud 6.4 0.4% Не раскрыто Нет 58%
PayCek 6.4 0% 59 Не раскрыто Да 74%
Coinbase Commerce 6.2 1% 10 KYB и KYC 58%
DePay 6.2 1.5% Не раскрыто 42%
Apirone 6.1 0% Не раскрыто 58%
ALFAcoins 6.0 0.99% 19 Не раскрыто 53%
Radom 6.0 0.5% 12 Не раскрыто Да 68%
GoUrl 5.8 1.5% 14 Не требуется Нет 58%
Aurpay 5.7 0.8% 8 Не раскрыто 47%
Blockonomics 5.6 1% Не раскрыто 32%

Все провайдеры в этом списке

Speend #1
8.3/ 10

Merchant-side model: the business passes KYB, the payer opens nothing and sees no identity check.

От 0.5% 300 активов Только KYB
NOWPayments #2
8.0/ 10

Widest published asset list in the category, at a flat rate, non-custodial by default.

От 1% 350 активов Не раскрыто
BTCPay Server #3
7.7/ 10

Self-hosted open-source processor that takes no fee and never holds the merchant's funds.

От 0% активов Не требуется
CoinPayments #4
7.4/ 10

Long-running processor split-priced between coins and tokens, with batch withdrawals.

От 0.5% активов Не раскрыто
Crypto.com Pay #5
7.1/ 10

No transaction fee and a 0.5% settlement fee, fiat payouts in USD, EUR and AUD, plugins for six platforms.

От 0% 20 активов Только KYB
CoinRemitter #6
7.0/ 10

Charges nothing to accept and 0.23% on withdrawal, with no identity check at registration.

От 0% 13 активов Не требуется
Paymento #7
6.9/ 10

Non-custodial, wallet-to-wallet gateway with no merchant KYC, a 0.5% fee and a starting credit that covers the first sales.

От 0.5% активов Не требуется
Plisio #8
6.9/ 10

Lowest published headline rate, with a white-label tier priced openly rather than on request.

От 0.5% 12 активов Не раскрыто
CoinGate #9
6.7/ 10

European processor with the most completely published fee table in the index.

От 1% 10 активов Не раскрыто
MyCryptoCheckout #10
6.7/ 10

WordPress plugin with a flat annual licence and zero per-transaction fees, paying wallet to wallet across 100+ assets.

От 0% 100 активов Не требуется
OxaPay #11
6.6/ 10

Publishes a separate rate for every product it sells, from 1.5% invoices to 2% white label.

От 1.5% 20 активов Не требуется
CryptoCloud #12
6.4/ 10

Flat-fee gateway from 0.4% with free withdrawals, invoices in minutes, and plugins aimed at CIS and emerging-market merchants.

От 0.4% активов Не раскрыто
PayCek #13
6.4/ 10

Croatian processor that charges the merchant nothing and pays out the invoice in euros.

От 0% 59 активов Не раскрыто
Coinbase Commerce #14
6.2/ 10

A flat 1% from a listed public company, settling on-chain into USDC.

От 1% 10 активов KYB и KYC
DePay #15
6.2/ 10

Wallet-to-wallet payments across ten chains at 1.5%, or nothing at all if you host it yourself.

От 1.5% активов Не раскрыто
Apirone #16
6.1/ 10

Non custodial, free to accept, with the charge moved entirely to withdrawal.

От 0% активов Не раскрыто
ALFAcoins #17
6.0/ 10

Publishes a per-asset network fee table, which almost nobody in this category does.

От 0.99% 19 активов Не раскрыто
Radom #18
6.0/ 10

Prices crypto payments at 0.5% plus a flat 50 cents and publishes a rate for every other product too.

От 0.5% 12 активов Не раскрыто
GoUrl #19
5.8/ 10

Non-custodial payment box at 1.5% that forwards straight to the merchant's own wallet, with no verification.

От 1.5% 14 активов Не требуется
Aurpay #20
5.7/ 10

Eight stablecoin-and-Bitcoin rails at 0.8%, with plugins for eight ecommerce platforms.

От 0.8% 8 активов Не раскрыто
Blockonomics #21
5.6/ 10

Non custodial by design, at a flat 1%, with the first ten payments free.

От 1% активов Не раскрыто

Why the entry rate is the only rate that matters here#

Volume tiers are irrelevant below the thresholds that trigger them, and several providers in the wider index advertise floors that a small merchant will never see. This list is filtered to providers whose published rate applies from the first transaction for that reason.

It is a narrower cut than the main ranking and a more honest one for this reader. A rate reached at half a million monthly is not a small business rate, however prominently it appears on a pricing page.

What actually costs a small merchant money#

Fixed per-transaction components, more than percentages. A fee with a fixed part scales with order count rather than value, so at a low average order value it can dominate the percentage entirely.

Payout frequency is the second one. Withdrawal cost is paid per withdrawal, so a business taking money out weekly pays it fifty-two times a year regardless of revenue. Setting a threshold rather than withdrawing on every balance change is the cheapest fix available.

Where to spend your limited evaluation time#

On the plugin, if you run a shop on a common platform. A first-party plugin maintained by the provider is worth more than a small rate difference, because it gets security updates and follows the platform's release cycle.

And on one live test transaction including a deliberate underpayment. It costs a few dollars, takes fifteen minutes, and tells you more than the rest of the evaluation combined. The testing guide covers what to run.

Volume floors are the thing that disqualifies you fastest#

Several providers in this index require a minimum monthly volume or a trading history before they will open an account. BVNK states half a million a month with six months of history, and B2BINPAY imposes a five thousand minimum on bank transfers that rules out its fiat rails for a small merchant entirely.

Check for that constraint before anything else. A rate comparison against a provider that will decline your application is time spent on a decision you do not get to make.

The withdrawal fee scales with habit, not revenue#

A fixed payout fee costs the same on a two hundred withdrawal as on a twenty thousand one, so a small merchant withdrawing weekly pays a percentage that would horrify them if it were quoted as one.

Two providers here invert this usefully: CoinRemitter charges nothing to accept and 0.23% on withdrawal, and Apirone charges nothing to accept and a fixed fee out. Which suits you depends entirely on withdrawal size and frequency, and it is arithmetic worth doing.

Plugins are worth more here than anywhere else#

A small business rarely has a developer on hand, so a maintained plugin is the difference between an afternoon and a contract. The WooCommerce list covers the seven providers publishing first-party WordPress integrations.

Where no plugin exists, a hosted payment button is the honest fallback. It needs no code at all and costs you automatic reconciliation, which at small volume is a trade worth making.

Support matters more and is measurable less#

A small merchant with a stuck payment has no engineering team to diagnose it, so response time is a real operational cost rather than a comfort. It is also the criterion this index can verify least, since nothing about actual support quality is publishable.

The nearest available proxy is what a provider documents: whether there is a status page, whether the docs cover failure cases, whether support hours are stated. Read those rather than the testimonials.

Start smaller than you think#

One asset on one network, one payment method, no fiat settlement in the first month. Every additional dimension multiplies the ways a small operation can get confused, and the point of the first month is to learn whether customers use it at all.

The test-mode guide covers going live safely, and the going-live part matters more than the testing part for a business that cannot absorb a payment sitting in limbo.

The refund conversation to have before the first sale#

Crypto payments do not reverse, so a refund is a new outgoing payment at the current rate, and the price move between the two is yours. For a small merchant with thin margins that is a genuine exposure rather than a technicality.

Decide the policy first: refund in the original asset, in a stablecoin, or in bank currency by another route. The refunds guide covers what each choice costs and which one customers actually accept.

The cost nobody budgets for#

Your own time reconciling. At low volume most merchants match payments by hand, and an hour a month is a real cost that no fee table shows.

A provider whose dashboard exports cleanly into your accounting is worth more than a tenth of a percent. Ask to see the export format before signing.

Start with one asset on one network#

Every additional dimension multiplies the ways a small operation gets confused, and the point of the first month is learning whether customers use it at all.

Breadth can be added in an afternoon once the flow works. A broken reconciliation across six assets cannot be unwound as quickly.

Что отличает верх этого списка?

Speend получает 8.3, потому что published rate starts at 0.5% for same-currency settlement, among the lowest entry rates in this index. Слабое место — обратная сторона той же медали: conversion pricing is not published, and the 1% figure for automatic conversion comes from secondary reporting rather than from the provider's own page.

NOWPayments стоит на 8.0. The published asset list is the longest of any provider in this index, at 350+ currencies. Уступает он в том, что conversion and payout costs are not published, so the all-in figure cannot be computed from public pages.

Разрыв меньше половины балла между двумя провайдерами — внутри погрешности любой методики оценки, включая эту. Когда две позиции так близки, решайте по ограничению, которое отсеивает одну из них, а не по итогу.

Что проверить перед выбором из этого списка?

Доступны ли мерчантам в вашей стране именно те активы, которыми платят ваши покупатели. Каждый провайдер здесь публикует глобальный список длиннее того, что доступен конкретно вам, и ни один не делает этот разрыв легко находимым. 12 из 21 провайдеров в списке не публикуют ничего о верификации мерчанта, так что закладывайте на онбординг время, которое сейчас нельзя оценить.

Что читать дальше?

Вопросы, которые задают мерчанты

Какой криптошлюзы для малого бизнеса лучший?

Speend возглавляет список с 8.3 из 10 по опубликованным весам. Merchant-side model: the business passes KYB, the payer opens nothing and sees no identity check. Порядок изменится, если взвесить критерии иначе, и страница методики позволяет это сделать.

Как отбирались провайдеры?

Провайдеры с опубликованной ставкой, действующей с первой транзакции, а не с минимальной ставкой, достижимой только при объёме.

Сколько стоят эти провайдеры?

Опубликованные ставки процессинга в этом списке — от 0% до 1.5%, проверено в августе 2026. Стоимость конвертации — большая переменная, и 18 из 21 провайдеров здесь её не публикуют.

Этот список оплачен?

Ни один провайдер не платит за появление, за место или за формулировки. Порядок задают веса со страницы методики, применённые к баллам каждой карточки. Коммерческие отношения описаны на странице раскрытия интересов.

Проверено 9 дней назад